Which of the following is NOT a benefit of injury investigation?

Injury investigation serves multiple critical purposes within an organization, aimed primarily at ensuring safety and enhancing operational efficiency. While controlling costs, preventing future accidents, and understanding liability are all direct benefits of conducting thorough investigations, increasing employee morale is not a primary benefit derived from these activities.

Controlling costs is related to identifying root causes of injuries to prevent future incidents, which directly impacts financial resources by reducing compensation claims and potential fines. Preventing future accidents is perhaps the most paramount function of an injury investigation; it seeks to analyze the circumstances surrounding an incident, thus informing policies and procedures that mitigate the risk of recurrence. Understanding liability is crucial, as it helps an organization recognize its responsibilities and potential legal obligations stemming from workplace incidents.

Increasing employee morale, while important in overall workplace dynamics, does not inherently result from injury investigations themselves. Instead, morale could be positively impacted over time as a consequence of improved safety conditions, but it is not a direct outcome of the investigation process. Hence, this option stands out as not being a direct benefit of injury investigation.