Job standards may not be changed or lowered for the purpose of hiring one employee over another. Is this statement true or false?

The statement that job standards may not be changed or lowered for the purpose of hiring one employee over another is true. This principle is rooted in the importance of maintaining fairness and integrity within the hiring process. Job standards are designed to ensure that all candidates are evaluated against the same criteria, based on the skills and qualifications necessary to perform the job effectively.

Altering these standards for the advantage of a specific candidate could lead to a biased selection process, potentially allowing less qualified individuals to be hired at the expense of potentially better-suited candidates. This practice could also undermine employee morale and equity, as it creates perceptions of favoritism and unfair treatment among staff. Upholding consistent job standards supports not only the integrity of the hiring process but also contributes to the organization’s credibility and overall organizational effectiveness.

In contrast, the other options suggest scenarios where job standards could be flexible or dependent on circumstances. However, such flexibility can introduce subjectivity and bias, which are to be avoided in order to maintain a fair and equitable workplace environment.